Detection Rule Validation is important because it helps organizations to see the real-time health of their detection rules. Due to
detection rules that run in a perfect state of health and performance can stop working suddenly. Hence, it becomes almost impossible for security teams to keep up with the ever-changing health of your detection rules.
For instance, in one scenario, you might have a day where only 16 detection rules are not working; the next day, you can see that that number has skyrocketed to 250. Or, you might have a detection rule that used to run in 1.25 seconds before taking 5 minutes to run right now.
While your security team might have trouble and spend hours figuring out the reason for such dramatic change, the reason might be an unavailable log source, the use of the wrong accelerator, an index update issue, or a broken log source. Sudden changes in the health and performance of detection rules require the immediate attention of an organization’s security team. Even though you might claim that your organization has enough human resources, manual detection rule validation results in high costs and inefficient use of your human resources.
In other words, your defense team must give their undivided attention to figuring out the root cause of sudden changes in your detection rule health. Thus, the detection rule validation process has to be automated as it helps organizations understand the point-in-time health of their detection rules and highlights the possible causes behind issues encountered.
Focusing on what matters most is a key benefit of Detection Rule Validation, as it helps security teams to prioritize their efforts and resources more effectively.
Your Detection Rule Validation solution can provide rule insights for your detection rules. Detection rule insight can show you the high and medium priority issues that require your security team’s attention.
During Detection Rule Validation, issues that can cause a detection rule to stop functioning are flagged as High Priority Issues. While such issues commonly include unavailable or broken log sources, there can also be problems with the index update process that hampers the detection rule’s ability to receive updates from the associated data model.
For instance, an unavailable log source could arise from network connectivity problems or a malfunctioning device, resulting in a lack of incoming logs for the detection rule. Simultaneously, an index update issue may occur, preventing the detection rule from receiving the latest information stored in the summary index associated with the data model.
To ensure effective detection, these high priority issues require prompt resolution. It involves addressing any log source issues, such as fixing network connectivity or resolving device malfunctions, and resolving any problems with the index update process to synchronize the data model with the summary index, enabling accurate detection and alert generation for potential security threats.
A medium priority issue refers to a problem or concern that is significant but not as urgent or critical as a high priority issue. It signifies an area of attention that requires action or resolution, albeit with a lower level of immediate impact or severity.
In the context of detection rules or security monitoring systems, a medium priority issue could indicate a situation that needs to be addressed to ensure optimal performance, efficiency, or accuracy of the rules. It may involve issues such as moderate resource consumption, suboptimal configuration settings, or certain limitations in rule logic or coverage.
While medium priority issues may not have an immediate detrimental effect on the system or security posture, they should still be acknowledged and resolved to maintain the effectiveness and reliability of the overall monitoring infrastructure. Addressing medium priority issues helps improve the system’s performance, enhance detection capabilities, and optimize resource utilization for better operational efficiency.
Enabling proactive rule validation is essential for maintaining a strong cybersecurity posture. By regularly validating SIEM detection rules, SOC teams can gain valuable insights into their threat coverage, accuracy, and performance. This allows them to quickly identify and address any gaps in their defenses, ensuring comprehensive protection against known and emerging threats. As a result, SOC teams can focus on real threats rather than being overwhelmed by irrelevant alerts.